Finding an Ethical Treatment for Cancer
Sacrificing unborn human infants for disease
treatment is seen as unethical. The technology uses embryonic stem cells,
which are extracted from the human embryo (blastocyst) four to five days post
fertilization. In the process of obtaining these stem cells from the
blastocyst, the human embryo is destroyed, killing the unborn infant. Is it worth killing unborn babies to treat
living humans? Shouldn’t we let fate
decide the outcome? These are all questions that need to be answered to
decide if stem cell research should be conducted. Along with the ethical
questions about embryonic stem cells, according to scientists at Columbia
University Medical Center, leading scientist’s “... have identified an inherent
feature of stem and progenitor cells that may promote initiation and
progression of cancerous tumors."(NewsRX.com) After these cells are
injected into the body, they have the potential to grow into any cell type.
Researchers have been examining the effects and have observed that the stem
cells may contribute to the growth of tumors. These counterclaims against stem
cell research causes many researchers to feel guilty for the work they are
doing. Even if the motivation is to treat an living human with cancer,
knowingly destroying the human embryo is an unjust and immoral act. (Morris 6)
That’s why the leading researchers should use adult stem cells or other options
to avoid killing an unborn baby in the process. The following method is much
more ethical and can be seen as a positive to both sides of the debate.
Leading scientists
are telling us that they can pursue the most promising stem cell research
without using--much less killing--human embryos. This breakthrough enables
researchers to create human embryonic stem cells directly from adult cells. In
fact, the new method may actually prove superior to embryo-destructive
alternatives. This is the biggest stem cell advance since James Thomson became
the first scientist to isolate embryonic stem cells, less than a decade ago.
(Anderson)
Since treatment with embryonic stem cells are seen
as controversial and cruel, doctors must use adult stem cells for repairing damaged
cells from cancer. Today, “...adult stem
cells are already used in therapies to treat several diseases and are being
tested in hundreds of clinical trials, while not a single embryonic stem cell
therapy exists, even in trials.” (Anderson) With the elimination of the unjust and corrupt
techniques in obtaining embryonic stem cells, there is little debate regarding
research of adult stem cell therapies and treatments. These adult stem cells
are mostly found in tissues and organs, including the skin, skeletal muscle,
bone marrow, brain, and blood vessels. (National Institutes of Health) The
obvious advantage of using adult stem cells is that embryos do not have to be
invaded and then discarded after cells are extracted. The vast majority of
people would prefer this type of therapy because it avoids the ethical and
moral dilemma of destroying developing embryos for the treatment of diseases.
Perhaps the most important potential application of human stem
cells is the generation of cells and tissues that could be used for cell-based
therapies. Today, donated organs and tissues are often used to replace ailing
or destroyed tissue, but the need for transplantable tissues and organs far
outweighs the available supply. Stem cells, directed to differentiate into
specific cell types, offer the possibility of a renewable source of replacement
cells and tissues to treat diseases including Alzheimer's diseases, spinal cord
injury, stroke, burns, heart disease, diabetes, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid
arthritis. (National Institutes of Health)
Despite ongoing research with stem cells, we
currently do not possess a treatment or cure for cancer. According to Joanne
Kurtzberg, MD., "... stem cells have a lot of promise but we are in the
infancy because real stem cells are very difficult to control as therapy...
There are no current stem cell cures for these major diseases.”
(Kurtzberg). The future for stem cell therapies is positive since the Appeals Court
lifted the ban on stem cell research in 2011 and granted federal funding.
Scientist’s have been conducting animal tests using adult stem cells, which have
been very promising. Scientists have done tests on mice using stem cells and
they have been successful in treating diabetes and Parkinson's disease,
repairing heart tissue, and treating spinal cord injuries. (Morris) Significant
successes have been performed using adult stem cells. “Human adult stem cells
have been used to treat human blood diseases such as leukemia and lymphoma for
over 40 years. The cells used for this treatment are called adult hematopoietic
stem cells.” (Morris). These cells are capable of doing many things such as developing into different types of blood
cells. With federal funding and the top
researchers in the country conducting clinical trials for stem cells, it is
estimated that we will have a cure for most diseases in about 10 years.
Some Scientists believe that embryonic stem cells may offer an advantage over
adult stem cells. Despite the ethical controversy, embryonic stem cells are
thought to develop into many different cell types in the body since they are
pluripotent. Embryonic stem cells are very easy to cultivate while on the other
hand, it is extremely challenging with adult stem cells due to the mature
tissue. Although embryonic stem cells are seen as unethical, “...adult stem
cells are thought to be limited to differentiating into different cell types of
their tissue of origin.” (Stem Cell Basics) Researchers looked beyond adult
stem cells to find a more beneficial technique to use embryonic stem cells
without injuring the embryo. “William Hurlbut, a physician and bioethicist at
Stanford University pondered this issue [and] presented his own solution:
altered nuclear transfer (ANT) -- an approach that might permit researchers to
use ‘embryo-like stem cells’ without creating or destroying actual embryos”
(Desmond). This approach would take advantage of benefits of undifferentiated embryonic
without sacrificing unborn babies. Altered nuclear transfers would satisfy the
views of both sides of the debate and solve the stem cell controversy with its
ethics and production .
Stem cell research should be conducted in an ethical way by preserving the human embryo and using human adult stem cells or altered nuclear transfer (ANT). Destroying a human embryo and killing an unborn baby is not acceptable while trying to find a cure for cancer. Society should support alternative ways of procuring these undifferentiated stem cells without sacrificing human embryos. Embryonic stem cells have almost unlimited potential since they can divide and multiply into almost all cell types replacing damaged ones. “Every day that we wait, more than 3,000 Americans lose their lives to diseases that may someday be treatable because of stem-cell research." (Desmond) Scientific researchers must persist in the efforts to find an ethical way of using stem cells to find a cure for cancer.
Stem cell research should be conducted in an ethical way by preserving the human embryo and using human adult stem cells or altered nuclear transfer (ANT). Destroying a human embryo and killing an unborn baby is not acceptable while trying to find a cure for cancer. Society should support alternative ways of procuring these undifferentiated stem cells without sacrificing human embryos. Embryonic stem cells have almost unlimited potential since they can divide and multiply into almost all cell types replacing damaged ones. “Every day that we wait, more than 3,000 Americans lose their lives to diseases that may someday be treatable because of stem-cell research." (Desmond) Scientific researchers must persist in the efforts to find an ethical way of using stem cells to find a cure for cancer.
No comments:
Post a Comment